Achievements

ESTIMATING GROUNDWATER RECHARGE USING ARTIFICIAL TRACING TECHNIQUE IN HEBEI PLAIN

Updated :10,08,2012

Wang Bingguo1Jin Menggui1Yang Lei1 Wang Wenfeng2

1.School of Environmental StudiesChina University of GeosciencesWuhan 430074China

2.Beijing Geotechnical InstituteBeijing 100038)

 

Abstract: Artificial tritium and bromide were used as tracers to determine diffuse groundwater recharge in Hebei Plain, North China, in order to evaluate the impacts of different soil type, land-use, irrigation, and crop cultivation practice on recharge. 40 sites at the representative zones were chosen to reveal spatial change rule of recharge rates. Recharge rates determined by artificial tritium and bromide tracing for different sites vary from 0.15 to 1.42mm/d. The results also indicate that the recharge rate of the former was bigger than the latter by comparing irrigation and no irrigation, normal irrigation(0.42-0.58 mm/d) and water-saving irrigation(0.17-0.23 mm/d), no stalk mulch(0.56-0.80 mm/d) and stalk mulch(0.44-0.60 mm/d), grape(1.42 mm/d), apple(1.07 mm/d) and cropland(0.49 mm/d), vegetable(0.70 mm/d) and cropland(0.38 mm/d), peanut(0.51 mm/d) and peach(0.43 mm/d). By contrasting the results of tritium and bromide tracing test, it shows that the recharge rate of bromide tracing was bigger than that of the tritium tracing. The reason was also analyzed and so it came to the conclusion that tritium tracing was better than the bromide tracing. Based on these, the applicability of the method was further discussed.

Key words Artificial tracing techniqueTritiumBromideHebei plainGroundwater recharge

 


0 Introduction

At present, many methods such as direct measurement, water-balance method, Darcian approach, tracer technique, water table fluctuation method and numerical simulation method were used to estimate groundwater recharge (Scanlon et al. 2002; Simmers 1997). Tracer technique was developed quickly in the late 2-3 decades. There are three basal types generally for tracer technique in estimating groundwater recharge rate and process (Edson 1998). They are applied tracer, history tracer, and environmental tracer. Chemical or isotopic tracers are applied as a pulse at the soil surface or at some depth within the soil profile to estimate recharge (Wood et al. 1995). Infiltration of precipitation or irrigation transports the tracer downwards to a depth. Commonly used tracers include bromide, 3H, and visible dyes (Kung 1990; Flury et al. 1994, Forrer et al. 1999). Many investigators use tritium as an artificial tracer to follow water movement(Athavale and Rangarajan 1988; Jin et al, 2000). It is part of a water molecule it moves with the water and is not subject to anion exclusion. On the other hand, its concentration may be affected by plant uptake. Also, it requires relatively expensive measurement equipment and its use may be prohibited by environmental protection laws. Bromide is widely used(Jury, et al. 1982; Rice, et al. 1986; Sharma, et al. 1987; Hendrickx, et al. 1993) because: 1. Its background concentration is negligible in most environments; 2. It is very mobile and its behavior is very similar to that for nitrates and chlorides; 3. It is relatively cheap and easy to detect. It was also previously assumed that bromide was not taken up by vegetation and agricultural crops, but this assumption has been proved to be false (Kung, 1990).Historical tracers result from human activities or events in the past, such as contaminant spills (Nativ et al. 1995) or atmospheric nuclear testing (3H and 36Cl). These historical tracers or event markers are used to estimate recharge rates during the past 50 years (Allison et al. 1978, 1983, 1994; Scanlon 1992, 2000; Cook et al. 1994). Industrial and agricultural sources produce contaminants such as bromide, nitrate, atrazine, and arsenic, and these can provide qualitative evidence of recent recharge; however, uncertainties with respect to source location, concentration, and timing of contamination, as well as possible nonconservative behavior of contaminants, make it difficult to quantify recharge. Environmental tracers such as chloride (Cl) are produced naturally in the Earth’s atmosphere and are used to estimate recharge rates (Phillips 1994; Scanlon 2000). Here are results from the artificial tracing tests with tritium and bromide.

1       Background of the Research Area

Hebei Plain, adjacent to Beijing and Tianjin municipalities, is part of the Huang-Huai-Hai Catchment Plain in China. The southern boundary is the Yellow River and in the east the Bohai Bay of the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1) bound the plain. Its total size is 73,000 km2 and 4 million ha of which is cultivated land, with a population totaling 50 million. The Plain is one of the most important agricultural areas in China, has a very flat topography, deep soil and abundant sunshine resources. However, because of the monsoon influence the rainfall and runoff in the semi-area are highly variable, 60-70% of the annual precipitation (500-600mm) and run off being concentrated between June and August. This water resource variability thus produces a spectrum of natural disasters such as spring droughts, autumn floods, soil salinization and alkalisation, saline groundwater, which limit the development of agriculture in the area. In addition, with the development of agriculture since the 1980s, long-term groundwater over-extraction has led to a reduction of volume in fresh unconfined groundwater and continued lowering of piezometric levels for deep fresh confined water. This has resulted in serious environmental problems such as seawater intrusion, saline connate water invasion into fresh groundwater, land subsidence, etc.. Consequently, the conflicts between socio-economic development and water shortage and environmental degradation become increasingly critical. Agriculture, the largest water user in the area and demanding approximately 70% of total water supplyis facing an unsustainable situation.

Obviously water shortage is a bottleneck of the agricultural development in the area. Strategically, the key issue is to optimally develop and manage the limited water resources in the region such that they can be used on a sustainable basis. This requires a more precise determination and regulation of the agricultural and industrial requirement regimes within a framework of present resource availability and environmental constraints. Current water-saving agricultural practices in the area certainly impact on soil moisture regime and recharge processes and are directly reflected by differences in net groundwater recharge (Jin et al. 1998, 2000).

According to the hydrogeological conditions and groundwater system character, some representative zones from the piedmont to coastal plain were selected for particular research. They are Shijiazhuang representative zone (including Luquan, Luancheng, and Xinji) in piedmont plain, Hengshui and Dezhou representative zone in alluvial and lacustrine plain, and Cangzhou representative zone in coastal plain (Figure 1). General of the representative zones was listed in Table 1 as follows.


京津唐以南底图

Figure 1: Map of Hebei Plain


2       Principles and Methods

The procedure for determining groundwater recharge by artificial tritium tracing (Jin et al, 2000) is: Inject tritiated water to a known depth, monitor changes in tritium of soil water in profiles by sampling, calculate the vertical percolating velocity (v) of soil water by observing the downward movement (Dz) of the tritium peaks, then calculate groundwater recharge R from:

R= vq = qDz/Dt

Where Dt is the duration of tritium injection and

 

sampling; and q is the average soil water content in Dt over the depth Dz.

Profiles were established at each site for sampling one/two times. For each profile three holes were drilled by hand auger, the holes being located at the apex of a 10 cm triangle; each hole was 2 cm in diameter and 100 cm in depth. 30-ml of tritiated water was injected at this depth of 100cm though a canaliculus. At the centre of the triangle a PVC tube as a marker was buried to 40 cm below ground surface to locate the sample position.


Table 1: General of the representative zone

Geomorphological setting

Representative zone

Location

Water table depth m

Soil lithology

Mean rainfallmm/a

Alluvial and pluvial/ diluvial plain

Shijiazhuang

Huolu, luquan county

10-15

silt clay and silt

547

Niejiazhuang, Luancheng county

30-35

clay and silt

537

Jiucheng, Xinji county

25-30

silt

520

Alluvial and lacustrine plain

Hengshui

Hujiachi, Shenzhou county

10-15

clay

511.1

Experimental ground of agriculture, Taocheng region

1-3

clay and silt clay

511.1

Dezhou

Village of Dongbali, Chenzhuang town

1-4

silt clay

522.3

Village of Guojia'an, Songguantun town

2-4

silt

522.3

Alluvial and coastal plain

Cangzhou

Xiaozhaozhuang, Cangzhou county

1-4

silt

554.3


When sampling after the rainy season one must first locate the PVC marker, then soil was sampled. The sampling depth was from 1.0m to water table (or to 5.0m). The sampling depth interval was every 10 cm from 1.0m to 2.0m and 20cm below 2.0m. Each soil sample was about 200 g and was packed in a plastic bag to avoid evaporation. As soon as the samples arrived in laboratory, soil water was extracted from of each collected by oil bath distillation at 130oC. And then the water was delivered and tested by Liquid Scintillation Analyzer(model: Tri-Carb 3170 TR/SL) in Nanjing University.

Bromide injecting and sampling was as same as that of the tritium. But the samples are dried in the natural conditions, triturated and filtered by 1mm sizer.

 

 

Thereafter, 500ml of deionised water is added to 50 g of filtered sample and shaken for 2 hours. The mixture is then allowed to settle for 24 hours. The resulting solution is filtered through a 0.45 μm Millipore membrane filter and stored in a 596 ml polyethylene bottle. And then it is analyzed by ion electrode method.

Tritium and bromide were injected at 23 sites on August 17-24 and November 3-11, 2003 and sampled at September 21-29, 2004 and September 22-28, 2005. Each site represented a different type of soil, land use, irrigation and crop cultivation practice (Table 2 and Table 3).


Table 2: Summary of tritium and bromide tracing points(sampled at September 21-29, 2004)

Locations

Number

Soil

lithology

Land use type

Injection date

Sampling date

Memo

Xiaozhaozhuang ,Cangzhou county

CZ11

silt

wilderness

03-8-22

04-9-21

CZ13

wheat-maize

03-8-22

04-9-21

CZ61

apple

03-11-6

04-9-22

Chenzhuang, Dezhou county

DZ16*

silt clay

wilderness

03-8-23

04-9-23

DZ17*

maize-cotton

03-8-23

04-9-23

Songguantun, Dezhou county

DZ41

silt

cotton

03-11-5

04-9-23

DZ42

apple

03-11-5

04-9-23

DZ43

wheat-maize

03-11-5

04-9-23

Taocheng region, hengshuicounty

HS19

clay and silt clay

wilderness

03-8-24

04-9-25

HS21

maize

03-8-24

04-9-25

HS23*

wheat-maize

03-11-3

04-9-25

organic fertilizer

HS25*

wheat-maize

03-11-3

04-9-25

normal

HS27

wheat-maize

03-11-3

04-9-25

chemical fertilizer

Niejiazhuang, Luancheng county

LC05*

clay and silt

wheat-maize

03-8-20

04-9-28

sprinkling irrigation

LC07*

wheat-maize

03-8-20

04-9-28

normal irrigation

LC10*

wilderness

03-8-20

04-9-29

LC82*

wheat-maize

03-11-9

04-9-28

Stalk mulch

LC84*

wheat-maize

03-11-9

04-9-28

no stalk mulch

Huolu, luquan county

LQ02

silt clay and silt

maize

03-8-17

04-9-27

LQ03

wilderness

03-8-17

04-9-27

LQ71*

apple

03-11-8

04-9-26

LQ72*

grape

03-11-8

04-9-26

LQ73

wheat-maize

03-11-8

04-9-26


3       Results and Discussions

All of tritium and bromide profiles are shown in Figures 2 through 31 and the recharge rates are summarized in Table 4 and Table 5. Recharge rates determined by artificial tritium tracing for different sites varied from 0.15 to 1.42mm/d, though an additional bypass component is considered likely. The demonstrated spatial variability in recharge reflects different crops, cultivation practices, irrigation regimes and soil types. (1) Irrigation will naturally result in more groundwater recharge by a comparison of irrigation cropland and no irrigation wilderness for site CZ11 and CZ13, CZ12 and CZ14, DZ16 and DZ17, LC07 and

 

LC10 , LC81 and LC85 (for LQ02 and LQ03, because LQ03 located in the depression and inundated; for SZ151 and SZ152, because SZ152 was flooded by well-drilling slurry), and water-saving irrigation may reduce recharge by a comparison of sites LC05 and LC07, LC06 and LC08; (2) Different land use may result in different recharge rate. The orchards may benefit recharge (cf. LQ 71, LQ 72 and LQ 73), and the recharge rate for grape-planting is bigger than that of apple-planting. The recharge rate for peanut is bigger than that of peach (cf. XJ200 and XJ202) and the recharge rate for vegetable is bigger than that of crop (cf. CZ66 and CZ68); (3) coarse soil may result in more groundwater recharge (cf. CZ11, DZ16, DZ41); and (4) straw mulch will reduce recharge (cf. LC82 and LC84, LC83 and LC85).


Table 3: Summary of tritium and bromide tracing points(sampled at September 22-28, 2005)

Locations

Number

Soil

lithology

Land use type

Injection date

Sampling date

Memo

Xiaozhaozhuang,Cangzhou county

CZ12

silt

wilderness

03-8-22

05-9-28

CZ14

wheat-maize

03-8-22

05-9-28

CZ65

wilderness

04-5-20

05-9-28

CZ66

vegetable

04-5-20

05-9-28

CZ68

wheat-maize

04-5-20

05-9-28

Chenzhuang, Dezhou county

DZ18

silt clay

maize-cotton

03-8-23

05-9-27

Jiucheng, Xinji county

XJ200

silt

peanut

04-5-27

05-9-25

XJ202

peach

04-5-27

05-9-25

Hujiachi, Shenzhou county

SZ151

clay and silt clay

wheat-maize

04-5-27

05-9-26

SZ152

wilderness

04-5-27

05-9-26

Niejiazhuang, Luancheng county

LC06

silt clay

wheat-maize

03-8-20

05-9-22

sprinkling irrigation

LC08

wheat-maize

03-8-20

05-9-22

normal irrigation

LC81

wilderness

03-11-9

05-9-22

LC83

wheat-maize

03-11-9

05-9-23

Stalk mulch

LC85

wheat-maize

03-11-9

05-9-23

no mulch

LC88

wheat-maize

04-5-25

05-9-22

no fertilizer

Huolu, luquan county

LQ01

silt clay and silt

maize-wheat

03-8-17

05-9-24


By contrasting the results of tritium and bromide tracing test (Table 4 and Table 5),it indicates that the groundwater recharge rates of bromide tracing were bigger than that of the tritium tracing. It demonstrated the bromide moved approximately 24% faster than the tritiated water and the lagging of the tritiated water behind the bromide may be a result of anion exclusion 3. Hence, the result of tritium tracing is better than that of the bromide tracing. But the cost of tritium testing is much higher than the bromide.

The result also indicates some representative zones as Hengshui, Dezhou, and Cangzhou may be not applicable for using this method (figures 11 to 17) because of shallow water table. In that case, soil water movement was sharply affected by water table. Soil water was downward for precipitation and irrigation, and upward for evapotranspiration, so that the tracers moved up and down with the soil water, which may result in uncertainty. Therefore, this artificial tracing method is not fit for shallow water table.


 

 

 

 

Fig.30 Bromide tracing profile for site CZ66

Fig.31 Bromide tracing profile for site CZ68



In addition, the result may indicate that bypass flow recharge exists in the area(figure 26). Tritium tracer method can only determine diffuse recharge so that we do need alternative methods to determine bypass flow recharge.


Table 4 Summary of recharge rate determined by tritium or bromine tracing(sampled at September 21-29, 2004)

Number

ΔZ(cm)

θ (%)

t (d)

Precipitation

(mm)

Irrigation

(mm)

R(mm/d)

3H

Br-

3H

Br-

CZ11

30

-

35.3

396

757.8

0

0.27

-

CZ13

40

-

30.5

396

757.8

150

0.31

-

CZ61

0

-

321

452.6

150

-

DZ16*

20

20

30.4

397

722.6

0

0.15

0.15

DZ17*

80

80

32.2

397

722.6

90

0.65

0.65

DZ41

50

-

29.7

323

455.1

0

0.46

-

DZ42

0

-

323

455.1

75

-

-

DZ43

0

-

323

455.1

225

-

-

HS19

0

-

398

593.0

0

-

-

HS21

0

-

398

593.0

0

-

-

HS23*

10

0

327

379.1

225

-

-

HS25*

10

0

327

379.1

225

-

-

HS27

0

-

327

379.1

225

-

-

LC05*

30

40

30.7

405

701.7

158

0.23

0.30

LC07*

70

80

33.8

405

701.7

300

0.58

0.67

LC10*

40

60

33.0

406

701.7

0

0.32

0.49

LC82*

60

60

32.2

324

500.6

300

0.60

0.60

LC84*

80

130

32.5

324

500.6

300

0.80

1.30

LQ02

50

-

33.3

407

814

75

0.41

-

LQ03

150

-

26.4

407

814

0

0.97

-

LQ71*

110

110

31.5

323

538

150

1.07

1.07

LQ72*

150

230

30.7

323

538

150

1.42

2.18

LQ73

50

-

31.7

323

538

225

0.49

-

Note* showing tracer test of tritium and bromide

Table 5 Summary of recharge rate determined by tritium or bromine tracing(sampled at September 22-28, 2005)

Number

ΔZ(cm)

θ (%)

t (d)

Precipitation

(mm)

Irrigation

(mm)

R(mm/d)

3H

Br-

3H

Br-

CZ12

50

-

37.2

768

1357

0

0.24

-

CZ14

70

-

31.9

768

1357

450

0.29

-

CZ65

-

30

34.5

496

910

0

-

0.21

CZ66

-

105

33.1

496

910

1070

-

0.70

CZ68

-

57

32.9

496

910

270

-

0.38

DZ18*

80

110

35.0

766

1333

90

0.37

0.50

XJ200

-

168

14.9

486

890

600

-

0.51

XJ202

-

142

14.8

486

890

600

-

0.43

SZ151

-

47

37.2

487

890

375

-

0.36

SZ152

-

50

39.1

487

890

0

-

0.40

LC06*

50

60

25.7

764

1135

458

0.17

0.20

LC08*

90

90

35.7

764

1135

675

0.42

0.42

LC81*

50

50

29.6

683

934

0

0.22

0.22

LC83*

90

110

33.2

684

934

675

0.44

0.53

LC85*

120

190

32.1

684

934

675

0.56

0.89

LC88

-

75

29.8

485

833

300

-

0.46

LQ01

110

-

33.3

769

1135

450

0.48

-

Note* showing tracer test of tritium and bromide; SZ152 was flooded by well-drilling slurry.


4         Conclusions

Recharge rates determined by artificial tritium tracing for different sites varied from 0.15 to 1.42mm/d, though an additional bypass component is considered likely. The demonstrated spatial variability in recharge reflects the different crops, cultivation practices, irrigation regimes and soil types. (1) Irrigation will naturally result in more groundwater recharge by contrasting irrigation cropland and no irrigation wilderness and water-saving irrigation may reduce recharge by a comparison of sites LC05 and LC07, LC06 and LC08; (2) Different land use may result in different recharge rate. The orchards may benefit recharge (cf. LQ 71, LQ 72 and LQ 73), and the

 

recharge rate for grape-planting is bigger than that of apple-planting. The recharge rate for peanut is bigger than that of peach (cf. XJ200 and XJ202) and the recharge rate for vegetable is bigger than that of crop (cf. CZ66 and CZ68); (3) coarse soil may be result in more groundwater recharge (cf. CZ11DZ16DZ41); and (4) straw mulch will reduce recharge (cf. LC82 and LC84, LC83 and LC85). Contrasting the results of tritium and bromide tracing demonstrated the bromide moved approximately 24% faster than the tritiated water and the lagging of the tritiated water behind the bromide may be a result of anion exclusion. The result also indicates the method is not fit for shallow water table.


 

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the China of Geology Survey(200310400035-1), the National Science Foundation of China (40472123) and the Research Foundation for Outstanding Young Teachers, China University of GeosciencesWuhan(CUGQNL0631).

 

References

[1]      Allison G.B., Hughes M.W. 1978. The use of environmental chloride and tritium to estimate total recharge to an unconfined aquifer. Aust Journal Soil Res 16181195

[2]      Allison G.B., Hughes M.W. 1983. The use of natural tracers as indicators of soil-water movement in a temperate semi-arid region. Hydrogeology Journal 60157173

[3]      Allison G.B., Gee G.W. and Tyler S.W. 1994. Vadose zone techniques for estimating groundwater recharge in arid and semiarid regions. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 586-14

[4]      Athavale R.N., Rangarajan R. 1988. Natural recharge measurements in the hard-rock regions of semi-arid India using tritium injection – a review. In: Simmers I (ed) Estimation of natural groundwater recharge. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 175–195

[5]      Cook P.G., Jolly I.D., Leaney F.W., Walker G.R. 1994. Unsaturated zone tritium and chlorine 36 profiles from southern Australia: their use as tracers of soil water movement. Water Resources Research 3017091719

[6]      Edson T.D.. 1998.Tracer studies and groundwater recharge assessment in the eastern fringe of the Botswana Kalahari. Printing & Publishing Company Botswana(Pty) LimitedGaborone Botswana.19-26

[7]      Flury M., Fluhler H., Jury W.A., Leuenberger J. 1994. Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: a field study. Water Resources Research, 30:1945–1954

[8]      Forrer I., Kasteel R., Flury M., Fluhler H. 1999. Longitudinal and lateral dispersion in an unsaturated field soil. Water Resources Research, 35:3049–3060

[9]      Hendrickx JMH, Dekker L.W., Boersma O.H. 1993. Unstable wetting fronts in water-repellent field soils. J Environ Qual 22:109–118

[10]  Jin, Menggui, Ian Simmers, Renquan Zhang, 2000. Estimation of Groundwater Recharge at Wangtong, Hebei (Report). China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, China and Free University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

[11]  Jin, Menggui, Xing Liang, Ian Simmers, Yunfu Gao and Renquan Zhang, 2000. Estimation of groundwater recharge using artificial tritium tracing. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Hydrogeology and the Environment. Wuhan, China, 17-21 October 2000. China Environmental Science Press. 340-345.

[12]    Jin Menggui, Simmers Ian and Zhang Renquan. Preliminary Estimation of Groundwater Recharge at Wangtong, Hebei, P.R. China. In: Brahana et al, Gambling with Groundwater: Physical, chemical and biological aspects of aquifer-stream relations. Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 1998: 407-412.

[13]  Jury W.A., Stolzy L.H., Shous P., 1982. A field test of the transfer function model for predicting solute movement. Water Resources Research 18:369–375

[14]  Kung K.J. 1990. Influence of plant uptake on the performance of bromide tracer. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 54:975–979

[15]  Nativ R., Adar E., Dahan O., Geyh M. 1995. Water recharge and solute transport through the vadose zone of fractured chalk under desert conditions. Water Resources Research, 31:253–261

[16]    Phillips F.M. 1994. Environmental tracers for water movement in desert soils of the American Southwest. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 58:14–24

[17]  Porro I., Wierenga P.J. 1993. Transient and steady-state solute transport through a large unsaturated soil column. Ground Water, 312):193-200

[18]  Rice R.C., Bowman R.S., Jaynes D.B. 1986. Percolation of water below an irrigated field. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50:855–859

[19]  Scanlon B.R. 1992. Evaluation of liquid and vapor flow in desert soils based on chlorine-36 and tritium tracers and nonisothermal flow simulations. Water Resources Research, 28:285–297

[20]  Scanlon B.R. 2000. Uncertainties in estimating water fluxes and residence times using environmental tracers in an arid unsaturated zone. Water Resources Research, 36:395–409

[21]  Scanlon B.R., Healy R.W. and Cook P.G.. 2002. Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeology Journal.10(1)18-39

[22]  Sharma M.L., Watson J.D., Cresswell I.D. 1987. Estimation of areal recharge using a non-reactive chemical tracer. In: Fok Y-S (ed) Infiltration-principles and practices. University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, pp 316–325

[23]  Simmers I. (ed.).1997. Recharge of phreatic aquifers in (semi-)arid areas. IAH International Contributions to Hydrogeology, Vol.19, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 19–98

[24]  Wood W.W., Sanford W.E..1995. Chemical and isotopic methods for quantifying ground-water recharge in a regional, semiarid environment. Ground Water, 33:458–468